21 07, 2026

Doctrinal Pitfalls to Each Traditional Group.

By |2026-07-21T16:14:36+00:00July 21st, 2026|Theology|

p/c NASA. Today we consider the intellectual pitfalls to the FSSP, SSPX and sedevacantists, specifically on the topics of the papacy and Vatican II to show no one has the "Rosetta Stone" to the Church crisis. This is a very long one, but I think you’ll find it worth it if you can find the time to sit down and read it. It’s ultimately to unify—not divide—all the traditional groups under Jesus and Mary.  But we have to start with humility towards each other.  Humility is why you will see that I try to disprove even my own camp of views towards the Church crisis below. But let's start at [...]

25 06, 2026

Did the Pharisees Keep the Law?

By |2026-06-25T20:42:21+00:00June 25th, 2026|Theology|

One of the hazards in growing up in a Protestant nation like the USA is that our theology is suffused with dispensationalism and odd evangelical movies. Because of this, many American Christians (including Catholics) picture Jesus as a hippie with no concern for the moral law. The Pharisees, on the other hand, are portrayed as the people of the First Century in Israel who were overly-concerned with the Commandments and the Jewish law. Indeed, many Christian movies make Jesus out to be the beatnik who dissolved the moral law while the Pharisees were not only hypocrites, but even bad for thinking the Commandments mattered. The Church Fathers, however, paint a [...]

22 01, 2026

Fatima, Darwin and Liturgy

By |2026-01-20T18:22:20+00:00January 22nd, 2026|Theology|

In my last article, Fatima, Darwin and Dogma, we looked at how Darwinian evolution erroneously led most Catholics of the 20th century to believe dogma could evolve like a species.  We saw how this was no small part of Mary's dreaded "errors of Russia."  So also, if dogma can change overnight, then the liturgy can morph overnight, too.  (Of course, we know that the Bible and the Magisterium make it clear that neither a species nor Divine Revelation can evolve.  But one false premise, namely, Darwinian Evolution, can strangely affect even the Holy Mass.) Let's ask an important question:  Is tradition a living thing?  This is a tricky question.  If [...]

20 01, 2026

Fatima, Darwin and Dogma

By |2026-01-18T00:03:44+00:00January 20th, 2026|Theology|

The above prelate is Bishop Cuthbert O'Gara, a Canadian-born priest who was a heroic missionary to the Far East in the first half of the 20th century.  In 1947, Cuthbert was named bishop of Yuanling in 1947.  But in 1951, the holy bishop was arrested by Chinese Communists and imprisoned until his expulsion from the country in 1953.  Then, he returned to North America to warn Westerners of the evils of Communism. I only recently learned about him by watching Hugh Owen's Foundations Restored, a Catholic production unveiling the lies of Darwinian Evolution in favor of Biblical creation. Bishop Cuthbert insisted that the teaching of Darwin's evolution was absolutely central [...]

15 01, 2026

Oath Against Modernism

By |2026-01-11T22:36:08+00:00January 15th, 2026|Theology|

As many priests are being told they must take oaths in favor of ecumenism, I hereby take the oath against modernism that Pope St. Pius X asked all priests to take: I, Fr. David Nix (above) firmly embrace and accept each and every definition that has been set forth and declared by the unerring teaching authority of the Church, especially those principal truths which are directly opposed to the errors of this day. And first of all, I profess that God, the origin and end of all things, can be known with certainty by the natural light of reason from the created world (see Rom. 1:19), that is, from the [...]

17 11, 2025

Visibility vs. Infallibility in the Catholic Church

By |2025-11-17T13:34:31+00:00November 17th, 2025|Theology|

When the Son of Man comes, will He find faith on earth?—Christ in Saint Luke 18:8. From 2013 to 2020, a website called The Wild Voice conglomerated all of Francis' heresies, errors and leftist statements.  After listing hundreds of these, the site-manager apparently couldn’t keep up and stopped compiling it in 2020. Now, Leo continues the exact same theology, but presented in a less bombastic manner. But what if Leo goes further and "ordains a woman" or "changes the words of consecration"?  Of course, leftists will celebrate.  Mainstream US bishops, however, will ignore it.  They will simply hope the fall-out from this next iteration of apostasy fall on the heads [...]

12 08, 2025

Cardinal Newman and “the Development of Doctrine.”

By |2025-08-12T12:11:17+00:00August 12th, 2025|Theology|

John Henry Cardinal Newman was a 19th century British convert from Anglicanism to Catholicism.  In full transparency, I should be clear that today I am not going to assess his controversial views of the inerrancy of Scripture or evolution. Also, the topic of whether Newman be a good candidate for a future valid canonization is better tackled by the WM Review here. Today, I am only going to assess his teaching on the "Development of Doctrine" and what that means for Catholics in the 21st century. As a Jesuit-educated 20 year old in the late 1990s, I had been told by many in my life at that point that all [...]

12 06, 2025

A Blue-Collar Catholic Can Recognize a White-Collar Heretic.

By |2025-06-12T03:26:31+00:00June 12th, 2025|Theology|

Most American Catholics do not know the definition of a heretic.  However, a smaller percentage of mainstream Catholics who have studied a little theology might know that Catholics used to call Protestants "heretics," whereas they now prefer the term "separated brethren."  An even smaller percentage of Catholics, namely traditionalists, still prefer to label Protestants as "heretics" (as well they should.)  However, most traditional Catholics today are hesitant to grant the moniker "heretic" to anyone in the clergy without a formal canonical trial.  Why are they so free with the first group and hesitant with the second group? They are afraid that an obvious heretic in the hierarchy as such undermines [...]

23 01, 2025

Catholicism Is “the Eternal Gospel.”

By |2025-01-23T17:59:45+00:00January 23rd, 2025|Theology|

Recently, while reading the Book of the Apocalypse (the last book in the Bible frequently called "Revelation" by Protestants) I noticed the astonishing Greek words εὐαγγέλιον αἰώνιον (Apo 14:6) translated into the Latin as evangelium aeternum meaning "The Eternal Gospel" in English.  Upon reading that, I realized it was the very best definition of Catholicism, namely, the Eternal Gospel precisely because Divine Revelation cannot change (Mal 3:6.) If you look up catholic in a dictionary, you will find the word universal as one of the main definitions of the word.  This refers to catholic in general.  (Notice, I did not capitalize the word catholic in the two previous sentences.)  Thus, [...]

22 10, 2024

Dogma Evolves As Well As a Species

By |2024-10-22T12:40:31+00:00October 22nd, 2024|Theology|

p/c Nordic Biosite Dr. David Hillel Gelernter Ph. D is a Jewish man who is professor of computer science at Yale University.  At one point, he believed in Darwinian evolution.  But in 2019 he wrote a groundbreaking article called Giving Up Darwin that reveals his reversal on this.  It is probably my favorite proof against species-based evolution because it is neither biological nor theological, but rather mathematical.  I encourage you to read the entire article, but one excellent paragraph reads thus: "Do the numbers balance out? Is Neo-Darwinian evolution plausible after all? Axe reasoned as follows. Consider the whole history of living things—the entire group of every living organism ever. [...]

Go to Top